Skip to main content

What do you do? Communications. Huh?

One of the things I've noticed over the years about working in Communications is the lack of understanding of what it is we do. It goes from zero idea of what 'working in communications' means to 'but what is it really that you do?'

I suppose over time I have had to learn what it all means, too. I recall asking the difference between communications and marketing in a communications class at University of Ottawa. I'm not sure I can recall the answer, but I do recall the indignation of my fellow students who could not believe I'd ever consider the two the same function.

There is much variety in the profession, and there is even more interpretations.

I have heard or overhead people refer to Communications as the following:
  • marketing
  • media relations (some people believe media relations to be writing press releases. some of those people actually work in communications, too.)
  • public relations (some people have difficulty explaining the differences between media and public relations! and some people can't make up their mind what the differences are.)
  • advertising
  • writing stuff that isn't true
  • telecommunications
  • managing websites
For some reason, if I say, 'oh it's like marketing', then they know what that means. 
Or, if I say media relations, that, too, gets a comprehensive nod, but the term communications is simply too broad and too vague for numerous folks to appreciate my job. I can't say that I do a lot of writing because that doesn't explain it either--even though I do tend to do a lot of writing. 

Perhaps the easiest way to describe what I do is to say that I help organizations figure out what to say, when and how to their employees and to the public. I often get a blank stare in response, not because they don't understand; they just can't fathom that this could be or is somebody's job. Don't organizations know what to say and when to say it to their people? Isn't that common sense?

I agree. It is common sense...to me. But when you run an organization, sometimes you're either too close to it to see the bigger picture or you've not had enough experience to realize the fallout of certain communications faux-pas. It's always better to double-check with a professional.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Dear Executive: Say What You Mean

If you read Clare Lynch's article called: " 10 Ways to Protect Your Copy from A Verbose Exec ", you'll see the following sentence: "There's nothing worse than some verbose exec "improving" your finely crafted copy by inserting references to "delivering key learnings," "driving employee integration strategies," and "interfacing holistically with clients." If you're anything like me, you actually want to tackle rewriting those mucky terms she's highlighted. Let's start with the first one: delivering key learnings. The word 'learning' is a noun; that's not the problem. When you put an 's' on it, you are attempting to count an abstract concept like learning, and that causes confusion. Allow me to give you an example:  Merriam-Wester defines learning as: "knowledge or skill acquired by instruction or study." You do not typically count the number of knowledges you've acq...

"We can't tell them that."

The scenario: A project is delayed. Employees haven't heard any updates in about a month and the manager realizes he's 'got to get something out soon' because his boss has been asking what's going on. Manager:  I need a draft message for the project update. How soon can you get it to me? Communications Officer:  How about tomorrow? Manager:  I kind of need it today some time. Communications Officer:  How about today? Manager:  Okay good.  Communications Officer:  So the reason for the delay is other projects took priority but now it's time to return to this one, right? Manager:  "We can't tell them that."  Communications Officer:  Why not? Manager:  Well because it looks bad. I hear those words from a senior manager or executive and sigh. There are precious few things we truly "CAN'T" tell employees: private information about other employees financially-sensitive information the CEO's kid's cellpho...

How to Manage Document Version Control During Communications Campaigns

You've spent all this time working to get your communications right--whether you're the client, the manager, or the communications officer--and suddenly you see an 'older' version when the director sends out his/her message or it shows up on the corporate website. Then you swear out loud and realize that the reason you're seeing one of the changes from several versions ago is because someone made a boo-boo and pulled up the wrong non-final version. This is going to happen. In Communications work, we see a lot of versions of numerous documents via email, especially, causing challenges for version control. For these very situations, I purposefully have the following file naming convention so people know they have the latest version.  I "time-stamp" them. That means when I did my 'save-as', I captured the date and time in the document's file name. I do it ever time. Always. And it has consistently saved my bacon. Also, by doing it th...