Skip to main content

Treat employees the way you’d like to be treated.

Engagement is the intellectual and emotional inspiration that an employee feels in an organization, which propels them to always do their best at their job. It is also a state of mind that encourages employees to want not only to remain in the same workplace but also recommend it to their friends and family as a great place to work.

When your employees are engaged, they are more productive and your business is made stronger and more profitable, as a result. Your employees also become your most important ambassadors of your company’s brand. Engage them and keep them engaged and it will be tough for you to fail.

Engagement is not a one-time deal. “If you aren’t always moving it forward, you’ll end up slipping back,” says Peter Mayne, Director of Culture and Engagement from Farm Credit Canada. Farm Credit Canada scores more than 80% every year on their engagement survey, as established by Hewitt’s Engagement model.

Treat employees the way you’d like to be treated.
The beginning of employee engagement is in how well you treat them. 
Most employees want to be treated fairly, with respect and with understanding. 
This statement doesn’t necessarily mean giving pay raises; pay is often lower on the scale of priorities for employees than other areas such as career development, benefits, management behaviour and good communications.

Instead, employees want to be thanked, included, encouraged and to be afforded flexibility in times of difficulty. If an employee is going through a difficult time at home with a sick child or a troubling financial situation, a small amount of flexibility can go a long way towards keeping that employee engaged. 

Organizations may struggle with making sure employees are treated well for a number of reasons: 
  • Not having policies, procedures and programs in place.
  • Not making sure all managers are on board.
  • The leadership team not leading by example.
  • Focusing too hard on the immediate/short-term bottom-line.
  • Not being flexible and open to avoid the impression of favouritism.


Still, reaching out to your employee, saying good morning and making eye contact with them, asking about their family are all small ways to engage and connect with employees that demonstrates respect and humanity. We can't expect policy to take care of that for us.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Clarify, There's No Need to Explain

Clarifying is not the same as explaining. Let me explain. No, wait: let me clarify that...which is it? When I hear the word 'explain', I envision multiple paragraphs of additional text that may not be necessary. Whereas the word 'clarify' evokes a beautiful landscape of writing where every word means something and no word can be left out. In the meantime, yes, 'clarify' and 'explain' are synonyms, which means they are similar, not exactly alike. In the context of writing well and writing to engage, I recommend clarity over too much explanation; perhaps that's a better way to put it. If anyone needs me to clarify that, let me know.

Dear Executive: Say What You Mean

If you read Clare Lynch's article called: " 10 Ways to Protect Your Copy from A Verbose Exec ", you'll see the following sentence: "There's nothing worse than some verbose exec "improving" your finely crafted copy by inserting references to "delivering key learnings," "driving employee integration strategies," and "interfacing holistically with clients." If you're anything like me, you actually want to tackle rewriting those mucky terms she's highlighted. Let's start with the first one: delivering key learnings. The word 'learning' is a noun; that's not the problem. When you put an 's' on it, you are attempting to count an abstract concept like learning, and that causes confusion. Allow me to give you an example:  Merriam-Wester defines learning as: "knowledge or skill acquired by instruction or study." You do not typically count the number of knowledges you've acq...

What did I say yesterday?

Look at what messages have gone out before communicating new ones. A huge mistake managers often make is to communicate new messages without reviewing what they've already said on the subject in the past, hoping no one will notice. Imagine how far a politician would get using that approach. Unfortunately, we can imagine it all too well. The mistake is not in forgetting what you've said before; with all the messages coming from the CEO, the website, from various marketing and customer service campaigns, it's no wonder we cannot remember what we said yesterday. However, it is our job to either know or find out exactly how we characterize our messages and what we share, even long after we've shared it. For example, if you tell your team to focus on continuous improvement and then a week later, in a weak moment, yell at someone for taking too much time to reevaluate a process, you'll lose trust and credibility--probably two of the most important badges...