Skip to main content

Strategic and Operational Communications

There are two main kinds of Internal/Employee Communications:
Strategic and Operational

Organizations communicate for ongoing business operations but they also need to communicate big changes, important updates and new approaches.

Organizations use strategic communications to communicate about:
  • a new agenda--a new focus on digital platforms for communicating internally instead of paper memos
  • a specific problem or issue to address--a need to tighten overtime rules to save money
  • a new approach to the work they do--how they interact with customers 
Example:
Company Inc. has to communicate with employees about the need to tighten the rules on overtime activities during a tough period. 
A strategy for this situation might recommend:
  • emphasizing life-work balance as a priority, during this tough time
  • encourage flexible work schedules, but urging employees not to work longer hours
  • focus on the temporary nature of the adjustment
  • remind employees that overtime is an added bonus, not a guarantee
Organizations use operational communications all the time to share critical information to their employees on a timely basis so they can do their jobs. This information might include:
  • directives/policies on how to interact with customers
  • cheatsheets or technical manuals on how to use the computer systems and software 
  • updates to standard health & safety training
  • materials that show the how-to basics of various aspects of their job

Timing is critical for both strategic and operational communications, though often operational communications tends to get the most attention due to the ongoing and pressing nature of doing the job and supporting customers.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

If You Clarify, There's No Need to Explain

Clarifying is not the same as explaining. Let me explain. No, wait: let me clarify that...which is it? When I hear the word 'explain', I envision multiple paragraphs of additional text that may not be necessary. Whereas the word 'clarify' evokes a beautiful landscape of writing where every word means something and no word can be left out. In the meantime, yes, 'clarify' and 'explain' are synonyms, which means they are similar, not exactly alike. In the context of writing well and writing to engage, I recommend clarity over too much explanation; perhaps that's a better way to put it. If anyone needs me to clarify that, let me know.

What did I say yesterday?

Look at what messages have gone out before communicating new ones. A huge mistake managers often make is to communicate new messages without reviewing what they've already said on the subject in the past, hoping no one will notice. Imagine how far a politician would get using that approach. Unfortunately, we can imagine it all too well. The mistake is not in forgetting what you've said before; with all the messages coming from the CEO, the website, from various marketing and customer service campaigns, it's no wonder we cannot remember what we said yesterday. However, it is our job to either know or find out exactly how we characterize our messages and what we share, even long after we've shared it. For example, if you tell your team to focus on continuous improvement and then a week later, in a weak moment, yell at someone for taking too much time to reevaluate a process, you'll lose trust and credibility--probably two of the most important badges...

Dear Executive: Say What You Mean

If you read Clare Lynch's article called: " 10 Ways to Protect Your Copy from A Verbose Exec ", you'll see the following sentence: "There's nothing worse than some verbose exec "improving" your finely crafted copy by inserting references to "delivering key learnings," "driving employee integration strategies," and "interfacing holistically with clients." If you're anything like me, you actually want to tackle rewriting those mucky terms she's highlighted. Let's start with the first one: delivering key learnings. The word 'learning' is a noun; that's not the problem. When you put an 's' on it, you are attempting to count an abstract concept like learning, and that causes confusion. Allow me to give you an example:  Merriam-Wester defines learning as: "knowledge or skill acquired by instruction or study." You do not typically count the number of knowledges you've acq...